American Lung Association American Lung Association--Improving Life, One Breath at a Time
American Lung Association State of the Air 2004

Table of Contents

Executive Summary

Introduction

Regional Analyses

Tables:
Populations at Risk in the US
Populations at Risk in the Most Polluted Cities in US
Populations at Risk in the Most Polluted Counties in US
Populations at Risk in the Most Polluted Counties in Each State
Cleanest Cities in the US
Cleanest Counties in the US

Health Effects of Ozone and Particle Pollution
Particle Pollution: Deadly Then and Now
Ozone Pollution: the Most Pervasive Pollutant

Protecting the Nation From Air Pollution
The Clean Air Act: Under Fire
Delays that Harm
The Problem with Power Plants
Deep-Cleaning the Dirtiest Diesel

Conclusion

State Tables

Appendix A: Description of Methodology
Appendix B: Regional Differences In Sources For Ozone And Particle Pollution

DESCRIPTION OF METHODOLOGY

STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY: THE AIR QUALITY DATA

Data Sources
The data on air quality throughout the United States were obtained from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Air Quality System, formerly called Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS) database. The American Lung Association contracted with A.S.L. & Associates, Helena, Montana, to characterize
the hourly averaged ozone concentration information and the 24-hour averaged PM2.5 concentration information for the 3-year period for 2000-2002 for each monitoring site.

Design values for the annual PM2.5 concentrations by county were collected from data previously summarized by EPA and were used as reported September 9, 2003 by EPA at http://www.epa.gov/airtrends/pm25_design_values_2000-2002.pdf.

Ozone Data Analysis
The 2000, 2001, and 2002 AIRS hourly ozone data were used to calculate the daily 8-hour maximum concentration for each ozone-monitoring site. The data were considered for a 3-year period for the same reason that EPA uses 3 years of data to determine compliance with the ozone: to prevent a situation in any
single year, where anomalies of weather or other factors create air pollution levels, which inaccurately reflect the normal conditions. The highest 8-hour daily maximum concentration in each county for 2000, 2001, and 2002, based on the EPA-defined ozone season, was identified.

Using these results, A.S.L. & Associates prepared a table by county that summarized, for each of the 3 years, the number of days the ozone level was within the ranges identified by EPA based on the EPAAir Quality Index:

0.000 – 0.064 ppm Good (Green)
0.065 – 0.084 ppm Moderate (Yellow)
0.085 – 0.104 ppm Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups (Orange)
0.105 – 0.124 ppm Unhealthy (Red)
0.125 – 0.374 ppm Very Unhealthy (Purple)

 

No data capture criteria were used to eliminate monitoring sites. All data within the ozone season were used in the analysis because it was the goal to identify the number of days that 8-hour daily maximum concentrations occurred within the defined ranges.

Following receipt of the above information, the American Lung Association identified the number of days each county, with at least one ozone monitor, experienced air quality designated as orange, red, or purple.

Short-term Particle Pollution Data Analysis
A.S.L. & Associates identified the maximum daily 24-hour AIRS PM2.5 concentration for each county in 2000, 2001, and 2002 with monitoring information. Using these results, A.S.L. & Associates prepared a table by county that summarized, for each of the 3 years, the number of days the maximum of the daily PM2.5 concentration was within the ranges identified by EPA based on the EPA Air Quality Index:

from 0.0 µg/m3 to 15.4 µg/m3 Good (Green)
from 15.5 µg/m3 to 40.4 µg/m3 Moderate (Yellow)
from 40.5 µg/m3 to 65.4 µg/m3 Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups (Orange)
from 65.6 µg/m3 to 150.4 µg/m3 Unhealthy (Red)
from 65.6 µg/m3 to 150.4 µg/m3 Very Unhealthy (Purple)
greater than or equal to 250.5 µg/m3 Hazardous (Maroon)

No data capture criteria were used to eliminate monitoring sites. All data were used in the analysis because it was the goal to identify the number of days that the maximum in each county of the daily AIRS PM2.5 concentration occurred within the defined ranges.

Following receipt of the above information, the American Lung Association identified the number of days each county, with at least one PM2.5 monitor, experienced air quality designated as orange, red, or purple.

Description of County Grading System.

Ozone and short-term particle pollution (24-hour PM2.5)
The grades for ozone and short-term particle pollution (24-hour PM2.5) were based on a weighted average for each county calculated using the Air Quality Index as noted above. The number of orange days experienced by each county was assigned a factor of 1; red days were assigned a factor of 1.5 and purple days were assigned a factor of 2. By multiplying the total number of days within each category by their assigned factor, a total was determined. Because the monitoring data was collected over a 3-year period, the total was divided by three to determine the weighted average. Each county’s grade was determined using the weighted average. Counties were ranked by weighted average. Metropolitan areas were ranked by the highest weighted average among the counties in the Census Bureau-defined Metropolitan Statistical Area. In 2003, the U.S. Census Bureau published revised definitions for the nation’s Metropolitan Statistical Areas. Therefore, comparisons between MSAs of previous reports and the State of the Air: 2004 should be made with caution.

All counties with a weighted average of zero (corresponding to no exceedences of the 8-hour standard over the 3-year period) were given a grade of “A.” Counties with a weighted average of 0.3 to 0.9 (corresponding to 1 to 2 orange days) received a “B.” Counties receiving a “C” had only 3 to 6 days over the standard, including at most one red day, scored a weighted average of 1.0 to 2.0. Counties received a “D” if they had a weighted average of 2.1 to 3.2, which meant they had 7 to 9 days over the standard. Counties with weighted averages of 3.3 or higher (corresponding to approximately the 8-hour standard) received an “F.” These counties generally had at least 10 orange days or 9 days over the standard with at least one or more days in the red or purple category.

Grading System

Grade Weighted Average Approximate Number of Allowable Orange/Red/Purple Days
A 0.0 None
B 0.3 to 0.9 1 to 2 orange days with no red
C 1.0 to 2.0 3 to 6 days over the standard: 3 to 5 orange with no more
than 1 red OR 6 orange with no red
D 2.1 to 3.2 7 to 9 days over the standard: 7 total (including up to 2 red)
to 9 orange with no red
F 3.3 or higher 9 days or more over the standard: 10 orange days or 9 total
including at least 1 or more red or purple

Weighted averages allow comparisons to be drawn based on severity of air pollution. For example, if one county had 9 orange days and 0 red days, it would earn a weighted average of 3.0 and a D grade. However, another county which had only 8 orange days, but it also had 2 red days, which signify days with more serious air pollution, would receive a F. That second county would have a weighted average of 3.7.

Note that this system differs significantly from the methodology EPA uses to determine violations of both the ozone standard and the 24-hour PM2.5. EPA determines whether a county violates the standard based on the 4th maximum daily 8-hour ozone reading each year averaged over three years. Multiple days of unhealthy air beyond the highest four in each year are not considered. By contrast, the system used in this report recognizes when a community’s air quality repeatedly results in unhealthy air throughout the three years. Consequently, some counties will receive grades of “F” in this report showing repeated instances of unhealthy air, while still meeting EPA’s 1997 ozone standard or the 1-hour ozone standard set in 1979.

Long-term particle pollution (Annual PM2.5)
Since no comparable Air Quality Index exists for long-term particle pollution (annual PM2.5), the grading was based on EPA’s determination of violations of the national ambient air quality standard for annual PM2.5 of 15 µg/m3, as reported September 9, 2003 by EPA at http://www.epa.gov/airtrends/pm25_design_values_2000-2002.pdf. Counties that EPA listed as being in attainment of the standard were given grades of “Pass.” Counties EPA listed as being in nonattainment were given grades of “Fail.” Where insufficient data existed for EPA to determine attainment or nonattainment, those counties received a grade of “Incomplete.” Counties were ranked by design value. Metropolitan areas were ranked by the design value among the counties in the Census Bureau-defined Metropolitan Statistical Area as of 2003. The design value is the calculated concentration of a pollutant based on the form of the national ambient air quality standard, and is used by EPA to determine whether or not the county meets the standard.

Continue...



Home | Take Action | Air Quality Info & Events | Diseases A - Z | Donate | Local Support | Contact Us


The information contained in this American Lung Association® website is not a substitute for medical advice or treatment, and the Lung Association recommends consultation with your doctor or health care professional.

© 2004 American Lung Association. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.